Suomalaisen maidontuottajan tulee tehdä laatua halvalla, joten odotan samaa myös teollisuudelta tai ostan ulkomaisen.
32 senttiä / litra on ehkä se "halpa" hinta jota sinulle maksetaan? Tai sitten osaat selittää millä tavalla tuotat enemmän laatua kuin vaikka Uuden Seelannin tuottaja?
Ei sillä, laatua pitää vaatia.
Tarttisko sitä uurenseelannin hintaa verrata 1-luokan maitoon,eikä e?
Milk somatic cell counts are an issue in the international trade of milk and milk products and this was a major issue between the U.S. and the E.U. in the spring of 1997. The problem is that the U.S. has the highest upper limit for SCC (750,000 cells/ml) of all the major developed dairy producing countries of the world. The E.U., New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, and Norway all accept 400,000 SCC as the upper limit and New Zealand may consider adopting 300,000 cells/ml in the future. Canada has now agreed on 500,000 SCC throughout all of the provinces and is already investigating the possibility of going to 400,000 cells/ml. This clearly leaves the U.S. in an unenviable position in the international market place of having to defend the concept that U.S. dairy products are as safe and as high quality as products from any other country. The U.S. media often states that U.S. dairy products are the safest in the world. Where is the proof of this statement? The U.S. position is that SCC are an issue of quality but not safety. This view is not shared by the E.U. due to the broader view and interpretation of "hygienic requirements" (5,6,7).
Kertokoon joku joka osaa paremmin enklantia.Minen osaa kuin moommaa
